Moscow 1980 boycotted, Los Angeles
1984 boycotted, Beijing in 2008 boycotted? The concept
of the Olympics is for the world of sports to transcend
the realm of politics. But over the years this idea
has been sadly forgotten, blurred, and tainted. The
Olympic games are politics and politics are the Olympics.
In 1980 then president Jimmy Carter announced that the
United States would boycott the Soviet Olympics, and
in retaliation the Soviets boycotted our Olympics four
summers later. Now, the 08' games in Beijing , China;
less then seven months away, are also in danger of experiencing
the same fate.
Although, no country has officially announced its withdrawal
from the 08' Olympics, numerous Non-Governmental Organizations
(NGOs) and a handful of celebrities have been working
to convince countries to boycott the Olympics in 2008.
Some notable leaders of the boycott movement include
Students for a Free Tibet, Reporters Without Borders,
and actor Richard Gere (the old guy in Pretty Woman).
The supporters of the boycott have used China's apathy
towards the genocides in Darfur and Burma as cannon
fodder for their arguments, and have unjustly nicknamed
the 08' Olympics as the "Genocide-Olympics"(how
original). They have also claimed that China has breached
human rights violations numerous times by persecuting
the practitioners of Falun Dafa, a rebel group led by
Li Hongzhi.
The Olympic games, were and always should be nothing
more than a sporting event showcasing the finest athletes
in the world; introducing politics and personal interest
is incredibly disrespectful to the athletes participating
in the Olympics, and to billions of people throughout
the world who will watch the games. It was wrong in
1980, it was wrong in 1984, and it is most definitely
wrong in 2008.
Although as the years pass by my memory does not seem
to serve me as well as it had before (most likely to
make room for academia related material), there are
some things that I will never forget: the love affair
that subsequently began the first time I had a chicken
alfredo, Andre Agassis's marathon tennis match with
Marcos Baghdatis, the four-hundred note cards which
I did in one night for Ms. Ajemian's Modern World History
class, and lastly the 2000 Sydney Olympics (when Marion
Jones was drug-free and the Dream Team still had some
credibility).
Perhaps what makes the Sydney Olympics so clear in
my mind is the fact that it was the first Olympics I
had ever watched. At that time I had understood the
Olympics to be nothing more than a smorgasbord of athletic
events. I was nine-years old at the time, and after
watching team USA destroy France in the men's basketball
finals( O' American basketball dominance where hast
thou gone?) I started playing basketball with dreams
of being in the Olympics myself. That dream has since
been replaced by astronaut, fire fighter, astronaut
again, and most recently country rock star. But, I digress...
My point is that the Sydney games were pure, and untainted
by controversy and that is the way the Olympics should
always be.
The Olympics are not a summit where all the nations
of the world come and discuss problems and point fingers
at each other; that is the World Summit's job. What
the supporters of the boycott are doing right now is
despicable and conversely they should be the ones being
condemned, not the organizers of the Olympics.
Aside from providing entertainment, the Olympics also
provide hope and inspiration for billions of people
across the world. The possibility of national pride
in the form of athletic accomplishments can lift an
entire countries' spirits. Athletics are a way for countries
to forget about strife, conflict, and famine. They are
a way for people to put aside their insignificant differences
and engage in a different type of conflict- one that
harbors no ill intensions and renders no loss of human
life. To instigate controversy and disagreement in an
event that is supposed to symbolize unity is truly contemptible.
The propagators of the boycott may have their reasons
for their efforts, but by using the Olympics as a stage
for their opinions is shameful and dishonest. The International
Olympics Committee (IOC) granted this privilege to the
People's Republic of China for their own reasons and
the weight that their decision carries should not be
overlooked. The IOC handed this responsibility to China
because they knew that the Chinese government would
host an Olympics truly befitting of a country which
is playing such a large role on the international playing
field. Former IOC president Juan Antonio Samaranch was
quoted as saying, "I would like to repeat I am
sure that the Olympic Games in Beijing will be the best
in Olympic history".
Thus, the Falun Dafa practitioners, the NGOs, and
Richard Gere should forego their actions until the closing
ceremonies of the 08' Olympics have ended. If they continue
their ridiculous quest to boycott the Beijing Olympics,
not only will they dirty the name of the Olympics but
will also be doing the entire world a terrible misdeed.
The Olympics is the only international event that can
bring the entire world together as one. They could be
held in Pyongyang, in Baghdad, or even in Millbrae and
it would not matter. The message which the Olympics
personify is not that of any country nor nationality,
it is the sigma of the world. So Mills students I urge
you! Boycott the boycott or convince Richard Gere to
come to his senses. |