Moscow 1980 boycotted, Los
Angeles 1984 boycotted, Beijing in 2008 boycotted? The concept
of the Olympics is for the world of sports to transcend the
realm of politics. But over the years this idea has been sadly
forgotten, blurred, and tainted. The Olympic games are politics
and politics are the Olympics. In 1980 then president Jimmy
Carter announced that the United States would boycott the Soviet
Olympics, and in retaliation the Soviets boycotted our Olympics
four summers later. Now, the 08' games in Beijing , China; less
then seven months away, are also in danger of experiencing the
same fate.
Although, no country has officially announced its
withdrawal from the 08' Olympics, numerous Non-Governmental
Organizations (NGOs) and a handful of celebrities have been
working to convince countries to boycott the Olympics in 2008.
Some notable leaders of the boycott movement include Students
for a Free Tibet, Reporters Without Borders, and actor Richard
Gere (the old guy in Pretty Woman). The supporters of the
boycott have used China's apathy towards the genocides in Darfur
and Burma as cannon fodder for their arguments, and have
unjustly nicknamed the 08' Olympics as the
"Genocide-Olympics"(how original). They have also
claimed that China has breached human rights violations numerous
times by persecuting the practitioners of Falun Dafa, a rebel
group led by Li Hongzhi.
The Olympic games, were and always should be nothing more
than a sporting event showcasing the finest athletes in the
world; introducing politics and personal interest is incredibly
disrespectful to the athletes participating in the Olympics, and
to billions of people throughout the world who will watch the
games. It was wrong in 1980, it was wrong in 1984, and it is
most definitely wrong in 2008.
Although as the years pass by my memory does not seem to
serve me as well as it had before (most likely to make room for
academia related material), there are some things that I will
never forget: the love affair that subsequently began the first
time I had a chicken alfredo, Andre Agassis's marathon tennis
match with Marcos Baghdatis, the four-hundred note cards which I
did in one night for Ms. Ajemian's Modern World History class,
and lastly the 2000 Sydney Olympics (when Marion Jones was
drug-free and the Dream Team still had some credibility).
Perhaps what makes the Sydney Olympics so clear in my mind is
the fact that it was the first Olympics I had ever watched. At
that time I had understood the Olympics to be nothing more than
a smorgasbord of athletic events. I was nine-years old at the
time, and after watching team USA destroy France in the men's
basketball finals( O' American basketball dominance where hast
thou gone?) I started playing basketball with dreams of being in
the Olympics myself. That dream has since been replaced by
astronaut, fire fighter, astronaut again, and most recently
country rock star. But, I digress... My point is that the Sydney
games were pure, and untainted by controversy and that is the
way the Olympics should always be. The Olympics are
not a summit where all the nations of the world come and discuss
problems and point fingers at each other; that is the World
Summit's job. What the supporters of the boycott are doing right
now is despicable and conversely they should be the ones being
condemned, not the organizers of the Olympics.
Aside from providing entertainment, the Olympics also provide
hope and inspiration for billions of people across the world.
The possibility of national pride in the form of athletic
accomplishments can lift an entire countries' spirits. Athletics
are a way for countries to forget about strife, conflict, and
famine. They are a way for people to put aside their
insignificant differences and engage in a different type of
conflict- one that harbors no ill intensions and renders no loss
of human life. To instigate controversy and disagreement in an
event that is supposed to symbolize unity is truly contemptible.
The propagators of the boycott may have their reasons for their
efforts, but by using the Olympics as a stage for their opinions
is shameful and dishonest. The International Olympics Committee
(IOC) granted this privilege to the People's Republic of China
for their own reasons and the weight that their decision carries
should not be overlooked. The IOC handed this responsibility to
China because they knew that the Chinese government would host
an Olympics truly befitting of a country which is playing such a
large role on the international playing field. Former IOC
president Juan Antonio Samaranch was quoted as saying, "I
would like to repeat I am sure that the Olympic Games in Beijing
will be the best in Olympic history".
Thus, the Falun Dafa practitioners, the NGOs, and Richard
Gere should forego their actions until the closing ceremonies of
the 08' Olympics have ended. If they continue their ridiculous
quest to boycott the Beijing Olympics, not only will they dirty
the name of the Olympics but will also be doing the entire world
a terrible misdeed. The Olympics is the only international event
that can bring the entire world together as one. They could be
held in Pyongyang, in Baghdad, or even in Millbrae and it would
not matter. The message which the Olympics personify is not that
of any country nor nationality, it is the sigma of the world. So
Mills students I urge you! Boycott the boycott or convince
Richard Gere to come to his senses. |